lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:00:23 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, jason@...edaemon.net,
        Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Device Tree Mailing List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/12] dt-bindings: irqchip: Introduce TISCI Interrupt
 router bindings

Hi,

* Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com> [190410 04:15]:
> +Example:
> +--------
> +The following example demonstrates both interrupt router node and the consumer
> +node(main gpio) on the AM654 SoC:
> +
> +main_intr: interrupt-controller0 {
> +	compatible = "ti,sci-intr";
> +	ti,intr-trigger-type = <1>;
> +	interrupt-controller;
> +	interrupt-parent = <&gic500>;
> +	#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> +	ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
> +	ti,sci-dst-id = <56>;
> +	ti,sci-rm-range-girq = <0x1>;
> +};

To me it seems there should not be too many of these interrupt
controller nodes for each SoC. Maybe you're already planning on
doing it, but I suggest that you just add more specific compatibles
and then look up the dst-id from a mapping table in the driver
similar to what patch 04/12 in this series is already doing.

That way you don't need to add custom TI specific (firmware
defined) device tree properties listed above ;)

Regards,

Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists