linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] <global> global spelling corrections for v5.1.0-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:29:27 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Kenny Van de Maele <kenny.vandemaele@...its.eu>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] <global> global spelling corrections for v5.1.0-rc5

On 4/11/19 8:00 AM, Kenny Van de Maele wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 07:58 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 4/11/19 2:12 AM, Kenny Van de Maele wrote:
>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>
>>>   git://github.com/vdmkenny/linux-spelling-fix.git tags/common-
>>> spelling-fixes-5.1.0-rc5
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to
>>> 6ee0055f3414a64133228e82004ea60d0e659d6d:
>>>
>>>   fix common spelling mistakes (2019-04-11 10:22:24 +0200)
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This PR contains a set of global spelling fixes of commonly miss-
>>> spelled
>>
>> misspelled
> 
> Bad joke :)
> 
>>
>>
>> Is there a way for me to review the diff on github?
> 
> https://github.com/vdmkenny/linux-spelling-fix/commit/6ee0055f3414a64133228e82004ea60d0e659d6d
> 
>>
>> thanks.
>>
>>
>>> words. Mostly documentation and comments were impacted, but a few
>>> lines
>>> of code were affected as well.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Kenny Van de Maele (1):
>>>       fix common spelling mistakes
>>
>>


recheck this one while I am still scanning the diff:


 drivers/clk/clk-hsdk-pll.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static int hsdk_pll_core_update_rate(struct hsdk_pll_clk *clk,
		return -EINVAL;

	/*
	 * Program divider to div-by-1 if we succesfuly set core clock below
	 * Program divider to div-by-1 if we successfuly set core clock below
	 * 500MHz threshold.
	 */
	if (rate <= CORE_IF_CLK_THRESHOLD_HZ)



-- 
~Randy