linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] <global> global spelling corrections for v5.1.0-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1a423b4e-16e7-8884-54ef-50833d472ca4@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:39:33 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Kenny Van de Maele <kenny.vandemaele@...its.eu>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] <global> global spelling corrections for v5.1.0-rc5

On 4/11/19 7:58 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 4/11/19 2:12 AM, Kenny Van de Maele wrote:
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>
>>   git://github.com/vdmkenny/linux-spelling-fix.git tags/common-
>> spelling-fixes-5.1.0-rc5
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to
>> 6ee0055f3414a64133228e82004ea60d0e659d6d:
>>
>>   fix common spelling mistakes (2019-04-11 10:22:24 +0200)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This PR contains a set of global spelling fixes of commonly miss-
>> spelled
> 
> misspelled
> 
> 
> Is there a way for me to review the diff on github?
> 
> thanks.
> 
> 
>> words. Mostly documentation and comments were impacted, but a few lines
>> of code were affected as well.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Kenny Van de Maele (1):
>>       fix common spelling mistakes
> 
> 


recheck:

drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00link.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ void rt2x00link_update_stats(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
		return;

	/*
-	 * Frame was received successfully since non-succesfull
+	 * Frame was received successfully since non-successfull
	 * frames would have been dropped by the hardware.
	 */
	qual->rx_success++;


-- 
~Randy