lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 12:43:24 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Convert hwmon documentation to ReST

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:22:37 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org> wrote:

> This series converts the contents of Documentation/hwmon to ReST
> format.
> 
> PS.: I opted to group the conversion files per groups of maintainer
> set, as, if I were to generate one patch per file, it would give around
> 160 patches.
> 
> I also added those patches to my development tree at:
> 	https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/log/?h=hwmon
> 
> If you want to see the results, they're at:
> 	https://www.infradead.org/~mchehab/hwmon/

This set seems generally good and could probably be applied as-is.  But I
have to ask...is there a reason to not take the last step and actually
bring this stuff into the Sphinx doc tree?

We seem to be mostly documenting sysfs files and such.  I am *guessing*
that perhaps the set should move to Documentation/admin-guide/hwmon?  Or
have I misunderstood the intended audience here?

Thanks,

jon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists