lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:27:13 +0200
From:   Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@...k-chips.com>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, mka@...omium.org,
        ryandcase@...omium.org, Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: rockchip: Make rkpwm a critical clock on rk3288

Am Dienstag, 9. April 2019, 22:47:06 CEST schrieb Douglas Anderson:
> Most rk3288-based boards are derived from the EVB and thus use a PWM
> regulator for the logic rail.  However, most rk3288-based boards don't
> specify the PWM regulator in their device tree.  We'll deal with that
> by making it critical.
> 
> NOTE: it's important to make it critical and not just IGNORE_UNUSED
> because all PWMs in the system share the same clock.  We don't want
> another PWM user to turn the clock on and off and kill the logic rail.
> 
> This change is in preparation for actually having the PWMs in the
> rk3288 device tree actually point to the proper PWM clock.  Up until
> now they've all pointed to the clock for the old IP block and they've
> all worked due to the fact that rkpwm was IGNORE_UNUSED and that the
> clock rates for both clocks were the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

applied for 5.2
I've added a comment line describing the pwm-reg reason.


Heiko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists