lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:28:07 -0400
From:   Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: change locked_vm's type from unsigned long to
 atomic64_t

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:55:43AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 02:22:23PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > On 03/04/2019 07:41, Daniel Jordan wrote:
> 
> > > -	dev_dbg(dev, "[%d] RLIMIT_MEMLOCK %c%ld %ld/%ld%s\n", current->pid,
> > > +	dev_dbg(dev, "[%d] RLIMIT_MEMLOCK %c%ld %lld/%lu%s\n", current->pid,
> > >  		incr ? '+' : '-', npages << PAGE_SHIFT,
> > > -		current->mm->locked_vm << PAGE_SHIFT, rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK),
> > > -		ret ? "- exceeded" : "");
> > > +		(s64)atomic64_read(&current->mm->locked_vm) << PAGE_SHIFT,
> > > +		rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK), ret ? "- exceeded" : "");
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > atomic64_read() returns "long" which matches "%ld", why this change (and
> > similar below)? You did not do this in the two pr_debug()s above anyway.
> 
> Unfortunately, architectures return inconsistent types for atomic64 ops.
> 
> Some return long (e..g. powerpc), some return long long (e.g. arc), and
> some return s64 (e.g. x86).

Yes, Mark said it all, I'm just chiming in to confirm that's why I added the
cast.

Btw, thanks for doing this, Mark.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists