lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190411205657.GT2839@atomide.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:56:57 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Remove
 omap_dm_timer_set_load_start

Hi,

* Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> [190411 19:21]:
> On 10/04/2019 22:07, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > * Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> [190410 17:02]:
> >> can you ask for an acked-by before pulling a patch in your tree?
> > 
> > I certainly do ask and wait for acks where possible :)
> 
> Ok, I may have missed them.
> 
> > Note that I have not applied this patch. I just added
> > Keerthy to Cc on this thread so maybe you misread the
> > message earlier. My comment "seems like no other
> > takers" was for Ladislav regarding somebody picking up
> > his earlier work, not for picking up this patch :)
> 
> Actually I was referring to the commit 592ea6bd1fad. Anyway as stated
> above I could have miss your call.

Hmm so commit 592ea6bd1fad was part of the PWM timer series
that was posted several times from late 2017 to end of
February 2018. I did not get any timer related acks or
comments so I applied it together with the PWM timer
changes.

I'm guessing you may have accidentally checked out some
older deja-vu branch from about a year ago? Commit
592ea6bd1fad is not related to this fix.. :)

Regards,

Tony



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ