linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: randomize kernel stack offset upon syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612BA4C4C052@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:36:18 +0000
From:   "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
CC:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
        "Perla, Enrico" <enrico.perla@...el.com>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: randomize kernel stack offset upon syscall

> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:24 AM Reshetova, Elena
> <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:13:58AM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> > > > > > index 7bc105f47d21..38ddc213a5e9 100644
> > > > > > --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> > > > > > @@ -35,6 +35,12 @@
> > > > > >  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > > > > >  #include <trace/events/syscalls.h>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET
> > > > > > +#include <linux/random.h>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +void *alloca(size_t size);
> > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >  #ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING
> > > > > >  /* Called on entry from user mode with IRQs off. */
> > > > > >  __visible inline void enter_from_user_mode(void)
> > > > > > @@ -273,6 +279,13 @@ __visible void do_syscall_64(unsigned long nr,
> struct
> > > > pt_regs *regs)
> > > > > >  {
> > > > > >         struct thread_info *ti;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET
> > > > > > +       size_t offset = ((size_t)prandom_u32()) % 256;
> > > > > > +       char *ptr = alloca(offset);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +       asm volatile("":"=m"(*ptr));
> > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >         enter_from_user_mode();
> > > > > >         local_irq_enable();
> > > > > >         ti = current_thread_info();
> > > > >
> > > > > Would it make sense to also do this for the compat syscalls
> > > > > (do_fast_syscall_32, do_int80_syscall_32)?
> > > >
> > > > Could someone please include the full patch, with justification and
> > > > performance impact analysis etc.? Can only find the code part of the
> > > > thread on lkml, which leaves out this context.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, this is very weird, I cannot find it either from lkml, but it was sent there
> > > to begin with (and as visible from reply-to headers).
> > >
> > > Do you want me to resent original version or with "do_fast_syscall_32,
> > > do_int80_syscall_32" additions (I am finishing testing them now).
> >
> > I will resend the original x86_64 now since this is the one I tested and
> > measured properly. The 32 bit changes seem to work fine inside my 32 bit VM,
> > but since I don't have any real 32 bit HW, I am hesitant to send them out without
> > real HW testing and measuring.
> >
> > This is the asm code for 32 bits (note it requires __builtin_alloca definition and not
> just alloca,
> > so I will change the 64 bit version to use it also):
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET
> >     size_t offset = ((size_t)prandom_u32()) % 256;
> > 0xc10025b6 call   0xc146f7d0 <prandom_u32>
> > 0xc10025bb movzbl %al,%eax
> >     char *ptr = __builtin_alloca(offset);
> > 0xc10025be add    $0x12,%eax
> > 0xc10025c1 and    $0x1fc,%eax
> > 0xc10025c6 sub    %eax,%esp
> > 0xc10025c8 lea    0x27(%esp),%eax
> > 0xc10025cc and    $0xfffffff0,%eax
> >
> > Also, the result is 47 different random offsets produced,
> > which is slightly better than 33 offsets for x86_64.
> >
> 
> I would suggest that you macro-ify this thing:
> 
> #ifdef WHATEVER
> #define add_random_stack_offset() do { void *addr = ... } while (0)
> #else
> #define add_random_stack_offset() do {} while (0)
> #endif
> 
> since you'll end up with more than one call site.

Sure, will do. So, you are ok for this to be also called from do_fast_syscall_32
and do_int80_syscall_32? I can send the resulting patch, just cannot test on any
real 32 bit HW, only VM. 

Best Regards,
Elena.