[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+ASDXNmxspD_3p-BftgySn5mPSYvSTeEXkzNS9B+ReZho-Uyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:27:17 -0700
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Ryan Case <ryandcase@...omium.org>,
Randall Spangler <rspangler@...omium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: cros_ec_spi: Transfer messages at
high priority
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 1:32 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> +static int cros_ec_xfer_high_pri(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> + struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg,
> + cros_ec_xfer_fn_t fn)
> +{
> + struct cros_ec_xfer_work_params params;
> +
> + INIT_WORK(¶ms.work, cros_ec_xfer_high_pri_work);
Sorry for the late review, but this should have been
INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(). Should it be a new patch, or is this in a
non-rebasing tree yet?
Otherwise, looks fine to me:
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists