lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190412101522.GB12424@e107155-lin> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:15:22 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] firmware/psci: add support for SYSTEM_RESET2 On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:10:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, April 12, 2019 12:02:27 PM CEST Sudeep Holla wrote: > > PSCI v1.1 introduced SYSTEM_RESET2 to allow both architectural resets > > where the semantics are described by the PSCI specification itself as > > well as vendor-specific resets. Currently only system warm reset > > semantics is defined as part of architectural resets by the specification. > > > > This patch implements support for SYSTEM_RESET2 by making using of > > reboot_mode passed by the reboot infrastructure in the kernel. > > > > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> > > --- > > drivers/firmware/psci.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++- > > include/uapi/linux/psci.h | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) [...] > > -- > > So I queued up the PSCI series from Ulf which clashes with this patch. > Ah OK, I wasn't aware(just back from holiday) that it's going through your tree. No worries, I will rebase and repost soon. I want testing by xilinx or Aaro Koskinen before that. > I can take this one too, but I'd rather avoid becoming a PSCI maintainer as a > result. :-) > I can understand, I assure it's one off :) -- Regards, Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists