[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b0f357c-5ec9-baab-761f-226bfb704564@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 16:10:25 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] ARM: davinci: ohci-da8xx: model the vbus GPIO as a
fixed regulator
On 11/04/19 3:00 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> Historically the power supply management in this driver has been handled
> in two separate places in parallel. Device-tree users simply defined an
> appropriate regulator, while two boards with no DT support (da830-evm and
> omapl138-hawk) passed functions defined in their respective board files
> over platform data. These functions simply used legacy GPIO calls to
> watch the oc GPIO for interrupts and disable the vbus GPIO when the irq
> fires.
>
> Commit d193abf1c913 ("usb: ohci-da8xx: add vbus and overcurrent gpios")
> updated these GPIO calls to the modern API and moved them inside the
> driver.
>
> This however is not the optimal solution for the vbus GPIO as it
> duplicates code. Instead we should model the GPIO as a fixed regulator
> that can be controlled with a GPIO.
>
> This series adds fixed regulators for all users of vbus GPIO, adds
> overcurrent protection using the existing vbus regulator in the USB
> driver and removes the vbus GPIO calls once they're no longer used.
>
> Tested on da830-evm with the module both built-in and loadable.
Looks good to me except some minor issues pointed out. If you can spin
the next version quickly, I would try merging for v5.2
Thanks,
Sekhar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists