[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190412113830.4126-9-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:38:30 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] perf intel-pt: Rationalize intel_pt_sync_switch()'s use of next_tid
Returning 1 from intel_pt_sync_switch() causes the current tid to be
set. That negates the need to keep next_tid anymore. Rationalize the code
to that effect.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
---
tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
index deaf2888dc55..551ae10d1c7b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
@@ -1859,7 +1859,6 @@ static int intel_pt_sync_switch(struct intel_pt *pt, int cpu, pid_t tid,
switch (ptq->switch_state) {
case INTEL_PT_SS_NOT_TRACING:
- ptq->next_tid = -1;
break;
case INTEL_PT_SS_UNKNOWN:
case INTEL_PT_SS_TRACING:
@@ -1879,13 +1878,14 @@ static int intel_pt_sync_switch(struct intel_pt *pt, int cpu, pid_t tid,
ptq->switch_state = INTEL_PT_SS_TRACING;
break;
case INTEL_PT_SS_EXPECTING_SWITCH_IP:
- ptq->next_tid = tid;
intel_pt_log("ERROR: cpu %d expecting switch ip\n", cpu);
break;
default:
break;
}
+ ptq->next_tid = -1;
+
return 1;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists