lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2068630.7I2iUbhqZj@diego>
Date:   Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:39:33 +0200
From:   Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Christoph Müllner 
        <christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>
Cc:     Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>, mturquette@...libre.com,
        sboyd@...nel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        xxx@...k-chips.com, xf@...k-chips.com, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
        Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] clk: rockchip: Add supprot to limit input rate for fractional divider

Am Freitag, 12. April 2019, 14:32:08 CEST schrieb Christoph Müllner:
> 
> On 12.04.19 14:21, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> > 
> > Am Freitag, 12. April 2019, 14:12:52 CEST schrieb Christoph Müllner:
> >> On 12.04.19 13:52, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> >>> Am Mittwoch, 3. April 2019, 11:42:24 CEST schrieb Elaine Zhang:
> >>>> From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> From Rockchips fractional divider usage, some clocks can be generated
> >>>> by fractional divider, but the input clock frequency of fractional
> >>>> divider should be less than a specified value.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
> >>>
> >>> can you tell me where these maximum input values come from?
> >>>
> >>> I talked to Christoph from Theobroma (Cc'ed) last week and he mentioned
> >>> that they're using the fractional divider with a higher input frequency
> >>> to create a very specific frequency [some details are gone from my memory
> >>> though] they can't get otherwise.
> >>>
> >>> So I really don't want to break their working setup by introducing barriers
> >>> that are not strictly necessary.
> >>>
> >>> @Christoph: can you describe the bits from your fractional setup that
> >>> I've forgotten please?
> >>
> >> We need to set the I2S0 clock to 24.56 MHz.
> >>
> >> When restricting the input frequency to a maximum of 600 Mhz,
> >> we could use the integer divider to get 400 Mhz (dividing by 2).
> >> However, with the 400 Mhz as input to the frac divider,
> >> we run into the problem, that the maximum possible output frequency
> >> is 20 MHz (there is another restriction which states that the
> >> fraction input : output frequency must be >= 20).
> > 
> > just for clarification, what is the current input frequency you
> > already use sucessfully?
> 
> Our working setup uses the integer divider to reduce to 400 MHz
> and uses the frac divider to get something near 24.56 MHz.
> I have to admit I have never measured what's on the clock line.

Ah ok, so the 600MHz input maximum is ok for your setup and the "< 20"
ratio is the question. I thought I remembered you using a higher than
600MHz input rate. [bad memory on my side]



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ