[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ae87289-a359-16cb-69fd-ecf48c17fb8d@rock-chips.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:56:57 +0800
From: "elaine.zhang" <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: dbasehore@...omium.org, amstan@...omium.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, briannorris@...omium.org,
mka@...omium.org, ryandcase@...omium.org,
Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] clk: rockchip: Turn on "aclk_dmac1" for suspend
hi,
在 2019/4/12 上午7:21, Douglas Anderson 写道:
> Experimentally it can be seen that going into deep sleep (specifically
> setting PMU_CLR_DMA and PMU_CLR_BUS in RK3288_PMU_PWRMODE_CON1)
> appears to fail unless "aclk_dmac1" is on. The failure is that the
> system never signals that it made it into suspend on the GLOBAL_PWROFF
> pin and it just hangs.
>
> NOTE that it's confirmed that it's the actual suspend that fails, not
> one of the earlier calls to read/write registers. Specifically if you
> comment out the "PMU_GLOBAL_INT_DISABLE" setting in
> rk3288_slp_mode_set() and then comment out the "cpu_do_idle()" call in
> rockchip_lpmode_enter() then you can exercise the whole suspend path
> without any crashing.
>
> This is currently not a problem with suspend upstream because there is
> no current way to exercise the deep suspend code. However, anyone
> trying to make it work will run into this issue.
>
> This was not a problem on shipping rk3288-based Chromebooks because
> those devices all ran on an old kernel based on 3.14. On that kernel
> "aclk_dmac1" appears to be left on all the time.
>
> There are several ways to skin this problem.
>
> A) We could add "aclk_dmac1" to the list of critical clocks and that
> apperas to work, but presumably that wastes power.
>
> B) We could keep a list of "struct clk" objects to enable at suspend
> time in clk-rk3288.c and use the standard clock APIs.
>
> C) We could make the rk3288-pmu driver keep a list of clocks to enable
> at suspend time. Presumably this would require a dts and bindings
> change.
>
> D) We could just whack the clock on in the existing syscore suspend
> function where we whack a bunch of other clocks. This is particularly
> easy because we know for sure that the clock's only parent
> ("aclk_cpu") is a critical clock so we don't need to do anything more
> than ungate it.
>
> In this case I have chosen D) because it seemed like the least work,
> but any of the other options would presumably also work fine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
> index 5a67b7869960..b245367393cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
> @@ -859,6 +859,9 @@ static const int rk3288_saved_cru_reg_ids[] = {
> RK3288_CLKSEL_CON(10),
> RK3288_CLKSEL_CON(33),
> RK3288_CLKSEL_CON(37),
> +
> + /* We turn aclk_dmac1 on for suspend; this will restore it */
> + RK3288_CLKGATE_CON(10),
> };
>
> static u32 rk3288_saved_cru_regs[ARRAY_SIZE(rk3288_saved_cru_reg_ids)];
> @@ -874,6 +877,14 @@ static int rk3288_clk_suspend(void)
> readl_relaxed(rk3288_cru_base + reg_id);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Going into deep sleep (specifically setting PMU_CLR_DMA in
> + * RK3288_PMU_PWRMODE_CON1) appears to fail unless
> + * "aclk_dmac1" is on.
> + */
> + writel_relaxed(1 << (12 + 16),
> + rk3288_cru_base + RK3288_CLKGATE_CON(10));
> +
> /*
> * Switch PLLs other than DPLL (for SDRAM) to slow mode to
> * avoid crashes on resume. The Mask ROM on the system will
Thank you for your correction.
Reviewed-by: Elaine Zhang<zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists