linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Zero initialize rdata in pwrap_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0d77d9bd-4b4e-8e40-a721-cf8eb0451c9e@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Apr 2019 21:58:29 +0200
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Zero initialize rdata in
 pwrap_init_cipher



On 20/03/2019 20:11, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 03:56:51PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>> When building with -Wsometimes-uninitialized, Clang warns:
>>
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c:1358:6: error: variable 'rdata' is
>> used uninitialized whenever '||' condition is true
>> [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
>>
>> If pwrap_write returns non-zero, pwrap_read will not be called to
>> initialize rdata, meaning that we will use some random uninitialized
>> stack value in our print statement. Zero initialize rdata in case this
>> happens.
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/401
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
>> ---
>>
>> I don't know if this is better or to just restructure the if statement
>> below (I'm not an expert in this code so I'll leave that up to the
>> maintainers to decide).
>>
>>  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>> index 8236a6c87e19..2f632e8790f7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>> @@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ static bool pwrap_is_pmic_cipher_ready(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
>>  static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
>>  {
>>  	int ret;
>> -	u32 rdata;
>> +	u32 rdata = 0;
>>  
>>  	pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_CIPHER_SWRST);
>>  	pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x0, PWRAP_CIPHER_SWRST);
>> -- 
>> 2.21.0
>>
> 
> Gentle ping (if there was a response to this, I didn't receive it). I
> know I sent it in the middle of a merge window so I get if it slipped
> through the cracks.
> 

applied now to v5.1-next/soc

thanks