[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190413075355.GA30428@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 00:53:55 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] RISC-V: Add separate asm/encoding.h for spec related
defines
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 07:39:35AM +0000, Anup Patel wrote:
> It's better to have all RISC-V spec related defines in one place
> so this patch adds separate asm/encoding.h for such defines which
> can be included in assembly as well as C code.
<asm/csr.h> can be included from assembly just fine already.
and we already do that. So I don't really see much of a point
in splitting it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists