[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhSdy2MJVOLQ_nTTf6FvSOPbyaCxL-J-eT2PfGMubptBL+rnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 13:45:07 +0530
From: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: Access CSRs using CSR numbers
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 1:25 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 07:39:44AM +0000, Anup Patel wrote:
> > We should prefer accessing CSRs using their CSR numbers because:
> > 1. It compiles fine with older toolchains.
> > 2. We can use latest CSR names in #define macro names of CSR numbers
> > as-per RISC-V spec.
> > 3. We can access newly added CSRs even if toolchain does not recognize
> > newly addes CSRs by name.
>
> This looks mostly fine, but also please remove all the comments
> regarding using sptbr instead of satp now that they are not true
> anymore.
Sure, will do.
Regards,
Anup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists