[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqHXK8HHXCj0FtZUtCzafYCYdOkdHm_wA6_NqN8q=iB-yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 01:18:14 -0700
From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] thermal/drivers/of: Add a get_temp_id callback function
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 1:07 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Currently when we register a sensor, we specify the sensor id and a data
> pointer to be passed when the get_temp function is called. However the
> sensor_id is not passed to the get_temp callback forcing the driver to
> do extra allocation and adding back pointer to find out from the sensor
> information the driver data and then back to the sensor id.
>
> Add a new callback get_temp_id() which will be called if set. It will
> call the get_temp_id() with the sensor id.
>
> That will be more consistent with the registering function.
>
Tested both patches on i.MX8MQ, seem to work as expected.
Tested-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists