linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] Provide in-kernel headers to make extending kernel easier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKOZueuf8qM1O7c+m7zRHv1b6-YsZmWoTBfErBLY+yV1pyESmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:52:22 -0700
From:   Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        atish patra <atishp04@...il.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Karim Yaghmour <karim.yaghmour@...rsys.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Manoj Rao <linux@...ojrajarao.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] Provide in-kernel headers to make extending kernel easier

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 6:49 PM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 3:02 AM Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > > > +extern char kernel_headers_data;
> > > > +extern char kernel_headers_data_end;
> > > > +
> > > > +static ssize_t
> > > > +ikheaders_read_current(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> > >
> > > Could you stretch this line ?
> > > It will still fit in 80-cols.
> > >
> > > (This is a coding style error in kernel/configs.c)
> >
> > It takes 87 cols if I expand, so I'll leave it as is.
> >
>
>
> Sorry if what I said was unclear.
>
> Since I just did not a good reason to put
> "static ssize_t" in the previous line,
> I meant like follows:
>
>
> [Before]
> static ssize_t
> ikheaders_read_current(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>                        size_t len, loff_t *offset)
>
>
>
> [After]
> static ssize_t ikheaders_read_current(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>                                       size_t len, loff_t *offset)
>
>
> (takes 74-cols.)
>
>
> (I am sending this from Gmail, so I am not sure
> how it will look like from you...)
>
>
> Anyway, it is super-bikeshedding stuff.
> It is OK as-is.
>

What about sorting the files for determinism?