[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00e76c9f-a551-ee83-9cb3-b2c3b8523c5c@web.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:42:15 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] phy: tegra: add missing of_node_put after
of_device_is_available
> @@ -260,8 +260,10 @@ tegra_xusb_pad_create(struct tegra_xusb_
> int err;
>
> np = tegra_xusb_find_pad_node(padctl, soc->name);
> - if (!np || !of_device_is_available(np))
> + if (!np || !of_device_is_available(np)) {
> + of_node_put(np);
> return NULL;
> + }
>
> pad = soc->ops->probe(padctl, soc, np);
> if (IS_ERR(pad)) {
How do you think about to move this function call to an additional jump target
for the desired exception handling?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists