lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:59:51 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: [patch V3 15/32] x86/irq/64: Use cpu entry area instead of orig_ist

The orig_ist[] array is a shadow copy of the IST array in the TSS. The
reason why it exists is that older kernels used two TSS variants with
different pointers into the debug stack. orig_ist[] contains the real
starting points.

There is no point anymore to do so because the same information can be
retrieved using the base address of the cpu entry area mapping and the
offsets of the various exception stacks.

No functional change. Preparation for removing orig_ist.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
 #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
+
+#include <asm/cpu_entry_area.h>
 #include <asm/io_apic.h>
 #include <asm/apic.h>
 
@@ -43,10 +45,9 @@ static inline void stack_overflow_check(
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
 #define STACK_MARGIN	128
-	struct orig_ist *oist;
-	u64 irq_stack_top, irq_stack_bottom;
-	u64 estack_top, estack_bottom;
+	u64 irq_stack_top, irq_stack_bottom, estack_top, estack_bottom;
 	u64 curbase = (u64)task_stack_page(current);
+	struct cea_exception_stacks *estacks;
 
 	if (user_mode(regs))
 		return;
@@ -60,9 +61,9 @@ static inline void stack_overflow_check(
 	if (regs->sp >= irq_stack_bottom && regs->sp <= irq_stack_top)
 		return;
 
-	oist = this_cpu_ptr(&orig_ist);
-	estack_top = (u64)oist->ist[ESTACK_DB];
-	estack_bottom = estack_top - DEBUG_STKSZ + STACK_MARGIN;
+	estacks = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
+	estack_top = CEA_ESTACK_TOP(estacks, DB);
+	estack_bottom = CEA_ESTACK_BOT(estacks, DB) + STACK_MARGIN;
 	if (regs->sp >= estack_bottom && regs->sp <= estack_top)
 		return;
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists