[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190414103608.257bd8b9@collabora.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 10:36:08 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, bbrezillon@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marek.vasut@...il.com,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, computersforpeace@...il.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nandsim: switch to exec_op interface
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 10:40:52 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> Stop using the legacy interface.
Thanks for converting the nandsim driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
> index 3d80e2d23b6e..33c369f9a607 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ union ns_mem {
> */
> struct nandsim {
> struct nand_chip chip;
> + struct nand_controller base;
> struct mtd_partition partitions[CONFIG_NANDSIM_MAX_PARTS];
> unsigned int nbparts;
>
> @@ -645,9 +646,6 @@ static int __init init_nandsim(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> - /* Force mtd to not do delays */
> - chip->legacy.chip_delay = 0;
> -
> /* Initialize the NAND flash parameters */
> ns->busw = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? 16 : 8;
> ns->geom.totsz = mtd->size;
> @@ -2077,24 +2075,6 @@ static void ns_nand_write_byte(struct nand_chip *chip, u_char byte)
> return;
> }
>
> -static void ns_hwcontrol(struct nand_chip *chip, int cmd, unsigned int bitmask)
> -{
> - struct nandsim *ns = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
> -
> - ns->lines.cle = bitmask & NAND_CLE ? 1 : 0;
> - ns->lines.ale = bitmask & NAND_ALE ? 1 : 0;
> - ns->lines.ce = bitmask & NAND_NCE ? 1 : 0;
> -
> - if (cmd != NAND_CMD_NONE)
> - ns_nand_write_byte(chip, cmd);
> -}
> -
> -static int ns_device_ready(struct nand_chip *chip)
> -{
> - NS_DBG("device_ready\n");
> - return 1;
> -}
> -
> static void ns_nand_write_buf(struct nand_chip *chip, const u_char *buf,
> int len)
> {
> @@ -2146,7 +2126,7 @@ static void ns_nand_read_buf(struct nand_chip *chip, u_char *buf, int len)
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> - buf[i] = chip->legacy.read_byte(chip);
> + buf[i] = ns_nand_read_byte(chip);
>
> return;
> }
> @@ -2169,6 +2149,46 @@ static void ns_nand_read_buf(struct nand_chip *chip, u_char *buf, int len)
> return;
> }
>
> +static int ns_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_operation *op,
> + bool check_only)
> +{
> + int i;
> + unsigned int op_id;
> + const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
> + struct nandsim *ns = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
> +
> + ns->lines.ce = chip->cur_cs == -1 ? 0 : 1;
You can assume ns->lines.ce is always 1, since there's no point
executing a NAND operation if the CS pin is not asserted. BTW, in case
you ever consider supporting multi-CS chips, the CS line to select is
passed through op->cs (you should not use nand->cur_cs).
The rest of the patch looks good. Once this tiny detail is addressed you
can add
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
> +
> + for (op_id = 0; op_id < op->ninstrs; op_id++) {
> + instr = &op->instrs[op_id];
> + ns->lines.cle = 0;
> + ns->lines.ale = 0;
> +
> + switch (instr->type) {
> + case NAND_OP_CMD_INSTR:
> + ns->lines.cle = 1;
> + ns_nand_write_byte(chip, instr->ctx.cmd.opcode);
> + break;
> + case NAND_OP_ADDR_INSTR:
> + ns->lines.ale = 1;
> + for (i = 0; i < instr->ctx.addr.naddrs; i++)
> + ns_nand_write_byte(chip, instr->ctx.addr.addrs[i]);
> + break;
> + case NAND_OP_DATA_IN_INSTR:
> + ns_nand_read_buf(chip, instr->ctx.data.buf.in, instr->ctx.data.len);
> + break;
> + case NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR:
> + ns_nand_write_buf(chip, instr->ctx.data.buf.out, instr->ctx.data.len);
> + break;
> + case NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR:
> + /* we are always ready */
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int ns_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
> {
> unsigned int eccsteps, eccbytes;
> @@ -2209,6 +2229,7 @@ static int ns_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
>
> static const struct nand_controller_ops ns_controller_ops = {
> .attach_chip = ns_attach_chip,
> + .exec_op = ns_exec_op,
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -2234,14 +2255,6 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
> nsmtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> nand_set_controller_data(chip, (void *)ns);
>
> - /*
> - * Register simulator's callbacks.
> - */
> - chip->legacy.cmd_ctrl = ns_hwcontrol;
> - chip->legacy.read_byte = ns_nand_read_byte;
> - chip->legacy.dev_ready = ns_device_ready;
> - chip->legacy.write_buf = ns_nand_write_buf;
> - chip->legacy.read_buf = ns_nand_read_buf;
> chip->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
> chip->ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
> /* The NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN option is necessary for 'overridesize' */
> @@ -2292,7 +2305,10 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
> if ((retval = parse_gravepages()) != 0)
> goto error;
>
> - chip->legacy.dummy_controller.ops = &ns_controller_ops;
> + nand_controller_init(&ns->base);
> + ns->base.ops = &ns_controller_ops;
> + chip->controller = &ns->base;
> +
> retval = nand_scan(chip, 1);
> if (retval) {
> NS_ERR("Could not scan NAND Simulator device\n");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists