[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904150923280.4917@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:23:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
cc: Andra Danciu <andradanciu1997@...il.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: mpc5200_dma: Fix invalid license ID
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 4:15 PM Andra Danciu <andradanciu1997@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > As the file had no other license notice/reference, it falls under the
> > project license and therefore the proper SPDX id is: GPL-2.0-only
> >
> > Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
> > Fixes: 1edfc2485d8dc ("ASoC: mpc5200_dma: Switch to SPDX identifier")
> > Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Andra Danciu <andradanciu1997@...il.com>
> > ---
> > sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c
> > index 4396442c2fdd..ccf9301889fe 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>
> According to Documentation/process/license-rules.rst this should be:
>
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Both are valid.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists