linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190415105458.63e97507@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:54:58 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  net/smc/af_smc.c

between commit:

  07603b230895 ("net/smc: propagate file from SMC to TCP socket")

from the net tree and commit:

  50717a37db03 ("net/smc: nonblocking connect rework")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/smc/af_smc.c
index 6f869ef49b32,e066899de72d..000000000000
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@@ -457,9 -447,10 +455,10 @@@ static void smc_switch_to_fallback(stru
  /* fall back during connect */
  static int smc_connect_fallback(struct smc_sock *smc, int reason_code)
  {
 -	smc->use_fallback = true;
 +	smc_switch_to_fallback(smc);
  	smc->fallback_rsn = reason_code;
  	smc_copy_sock_settings_to_clc(smc);
+ 	smc->connect_nonblock = 0;
  	if (smc->sk.sk_state == SMC_INIT)
  		smc->sk.sk_state = SMC_ACTIVE;
  	return 0;
@@@ -783,16 -780,10 +788,14 @@@ static void smc_connect_work(struct wor
  		smc->sk.sk_err = -rc;
  
  out:
 -	if (smc->sk.sk_err)
 -		smc->sk.sk_state_change(&smc->sk);
 -	else
 -		smc->sk.sk_write_space(&smc->sk);
 +	if (!sock_flag(&smc->sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
 +		if (smc->sk.sk_err) {
 +			smc->sk.sk_state_change(&smc->sk);
 +		} else { /* allow polling before and after fallback decision */
 +			smc->clcsock->sk->sk_write_space(smc->clcsock->sk);
 +			smc->sk.sk_write_space(&smc->sk);
 +		}
 +	}
- 	kfree(smc->connect_info);
- 	smc->connect_info = NULL;
  	release_sock(&smc->sk);
  }
  
@@@ -1244,19 -1215,11 +1232,14 @@@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work
  	struct socket *newclcsock = new_smc->clcsock;
  	struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm cclc;
  	struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc;
- 	struct smc_ib_device *ibdev;
+ 	struct smc_init_info ini = {0};
  	bool ism_supported = false;
- 	struct smcd_dev *ismdev;
  	u8 buf[SMC_CLC_MAX_LEN];
- 	int local_contact = 0;
- 	unsigned short vlan;
- 	int reason_code = 0;
  	int rc = 0;
- 	u8 ibport;
  
 +	if (new_smc->listen_smc->sk.sk_state != SMC_LISTEN)
 +		return smc_listen_out_err(new_smc);
 +
  	if (new_smc->use_fallback) {
  		smc_listen_out_connected(new_smc);
  		return;

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped