lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPf=nPrmw6Vzi_=LmO=dVsV4Gvoc-q75XP2FBEgm9Gxv0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:30:58 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Matheus Castello <matheus@...tello.eng.br>
Cc:     sre@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Bartłomiej Żołnierkiewicz 
        <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] power: supply: max17040: Send uevent in SOC changes

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 03:48, Matheus Castello <matheus@...tello.eng.br> wrote:
>
> Notify core through power_supply_changed() in case of changes in state
> of charge. This is useful for user-space to efficiently update current
> battery level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Castello <matheus@...tello.eng.br>
> ---
>  drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c
> index f036f272d52f..db901ebf495d 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c
> @@ -208,10 +208,17 @@ static void max17040_check_changes(struct i2c_client *client)
>  static void max17040_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>         struct max17040_chip *chip;
> +       int last_soc;
>
>         chip = container_of(work, struct max17040_chip, work.work);
> +       /* store SOC for check change */
> +       last_soc = chip->soc;
>         max17040_check_changes(chip->client);
>
> +       /* check changes and send uevent */
> +       if (last_soc != chip->soc)

chip->soc could be negative ERRNO so in such case I think user-space
should not be notified.

> +               power_supply_changed(chip->battery);
> +

You should also notify on online and status change (e.g. started
charging). User-space also wants to know that, e.g. to show the
charging icon or battery health status.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ