[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904150931170.4917@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:33:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Andra Danciu <andradanciu1997@...il.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: mpc5200_dma: Fix invalid license ID
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 10:26 AM Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:53 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 4:15 PM Andra Danciu <andradanciu1997@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > >
> > > According to Documentation/process/license-rules.rst this should be:
> > >
> > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
>
> Actually, according to
>
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html
>
> GPL-2.0 is another name for GPL-2.0-only
See also: LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0
Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
If the identifier would be invalid, scripts/spdxcheck.py would complain ...
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists