[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190415104047.mrtmv6w6kq5m44fp@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 12:40:47 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Alleged fix for writer stall on -rcu branch dev
On 2019-04-13 07:21:53 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> And after ramping up the stress in rcutorture a bit, I am able to
> reproduce this CPU stall involving offlining on my systems. My plan is
> my usual one: Keep increasing rcutorture stress to get it to reproduce
> in reasonable time, add diagnostics as appropriate, and continue making
> forward-progress improvements in RCU itself.
I *think* this one is also new:
|Assertion failure in /home/bigeasy/linux-rt/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2019.04.14-14:28:40/TREE03.37/console.log TREE03
|Summary: Warnings: 6 Call Traces: 6
https://breakpoint.cc/console-03.37.log
|Assertion failure in /home/bigeasy/linux-rt/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2019.04.14-14:28:40/TREE03.39/console.log TREE03
|Summary: Warnings: 4 Call Traces: 4
https://breakpoint.cc/console-03.39.log
This is still commit 33e04e451279 ("torture: Allow inter-stutter interval to be
specified").
> Thank you very much for locating this one!!!
You are welcome.
> Thanx, Paul
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists