lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 12:08:53 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ihab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@...el.com>,
        Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the
 wireless-drivers tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree got a
conflict in:

  drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/drv.c

between commits:

  0d5bad14226a ("iwlwifi: rename structs to fit the new names")
  972d8e137779 ("iwlwifi: add new 0x2723/0x2080 card for 22000")

from the wireless-drivers tree and commit:

  ef8a913766cd ("iwlwifi: remove misconfigured pci ids from 22260 series")

from the wireless-drivers-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/drv.c
index 9f1af8da9dc1,0329b626ada6..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/drv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/drv.c
@@@ -953,19 -953,15 +953,15 @@@ static const struct pci_device_id iwl_h
  	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0xA0F0, 0x1652, killer1650i_2ax_cfg_qu_b0_hr_b0)},
  	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0xA0F0, 0x4070, iwl_ax101_cfg_qu_hr)},
  
 -	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x0080, iwl22260_2ax_cfg)},
 -	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x0084, iwl22260_2ax_cfg)},
 -	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x0088, iwl22260_2ax_cfg)},
 -	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x008C, iwl22260_2ax_cfg)},
 +	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x0080, iwl_ax200_cfg_cc)},
 +	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x0084, iwl_ax200_cfg_cc)},
 +	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x0088, iwl_ax200_cfg_cc)},
 +	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x008C, iwl_ax200_cfg_cc)},
  	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x1653, killer1650w_2ax_cfg)},
  	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x1654, killer1650x_2ax_cfg)},
 -	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x2080, iwl22260_2ax_cfg)},
 -	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x4080, iwl22260_2ax_cfg)},
 -	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x4088, iwl22260_2ax_cfg)},
 +	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x2080, iwl_ax200_cfg_cc)},
 +	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x4080, iwl_ax200_cfg_cc)},
 +	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2723, 0x4088, iwl_ax200_cfg_cc)},
- 
- 	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x1a56, 0x1653, killer1650w_2ax_cfg)},
- 	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x1a56, 0x1654, killer1650x_2ax_cfg)},
- 
  	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x2725, 0x0090, iwlax210_2ax_cfg_so_hr_a0)},
  	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x7A70, 0x0090, iwlax210_2ax_cfg_so_hr_a0)},
  	{IWL_PCI_DEVICE(0x7A70, 0x0310, iwlax210_2ax_cfg_so_hr_a0)},

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists