lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:14:32 +0100
From:   Huw Davies <huw@...eweavers.com>
To:     Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/vdso: Allow clock specific mult and shift values

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:15:56AM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> On 15/04/2019 10:51, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019, Huw Davies wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>> See https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1902231727060.1666@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
> >>> for an alternate solution to this problem, which avoids this and just gives
> >>> CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW a separate storage space alltogether.
> >>
> >> I can certainly do this for the x86 vdso.  Would that be useful or
> >> should I wait for Vincenzo's work on the generic vdso first?
> > 
> > Depends. If Vincenzo comes along with his new version soon, then you might
> > get this for free :)
> > 
> > Vincenzo, what's the state of your work?
> >
> 
> I am mostly done with the development, the only thing missing is the integration
> of the generic update_vsyscall. After this is complete, I will need to do some
> testing and extract the performance numbers.
> 
> Considering that I will be on Easter holiday from this Wednesday till the end of
> April, I think v6 will be ready around second week of May.

Hi Vincenzo,

Great!  In which case there's not much point in me changing the x86
vdso---it'll just end up making more work for you.

Let me know if there's anything I can help with.

Huw.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists