lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:06:08 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <>
To:     Jens Axboe <>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        Ming Lei <>, Christoph Hellwig <>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:


between commit:

  1200e07f3ad4 ("block: don't use for-inside-for in bio_for_each_segment_all")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  52d52d1c98a9 ("block: only allow contiguous page structs in a bio_vec")

from the block tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc include/linux/bvec.h
index 3bc91879e1e2,44b0f4684190..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/bvec.h
+++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
@@@ -156,8 -151,8 +151,8 @@@ static inline void bvec_advance(const s
  	struct bio_vec *bv = &iter_all->bv;
 -	if (bv->bv_page) {
 +	if (iter_all->done) {
- 		bv->bv_page = nth_page(bv->bv_page, 1);
+ 		bv->bv_page++;
  		bv->bv_offset = 0;
  	} else {
  		bv->bv_page = bvec->bv_page;

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists