[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190415135320.GW14111@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 06:53:20 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
LKMM Maintainers -- Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Daniel Kroening <kroening@...ox.ac.uk>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Adding plain accesses and detecting data races in the LKMM
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:50:03AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > Another question is "should the kernel permit smp_mb__{before,after}*()
> > anywhere other than immediately before or after the primitive being
> > strengthened?"
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> How would the kernel forbid other constructions?
Coccinelle scripts added to 0day test robot.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists