lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190415143857.kg2dbg3zxsxdktsi@linutronix.de> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 16:38:57 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> To: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@...edi.com> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, kbuild-all@...org, Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com>, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci/switchtec: fix stream_open.cocci warnings (fwd) On 2019-04-13 17:00:59 [+0000], Kirill Smelkov wrote: > Hello everyone, Hi, > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 06:50:57PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Kirill will explain about this issue. > > pci/switchtec switching to stream_open is already queued to merge > window and it was acked by Logan Gunthorpe: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wgqgN5j1ZWnyVLqqoyU=CCWTYOko3MDyU8L_5e21KvHAg@mail.gmail.com/ > https://lab.nexedi.com/kirr/linux/commit/edaeb4101860 > > ( there are too many Cc's in that patch and email with it and reply-all to > it did not get into mailing list probably due to being considered as spam ) > > stream_open.cocci was issuing only warning for pci/switchtec, but after > 8a29a3bae2a2 ("pci/switchtec: Don't use completion's wait queue") they > started to use wait_even_* inside read method and, since > stream_open.cocci considers wait_event_* as blocking the warning became > error. Previously it was completions there, but I added support for wait > events only for simplicity. why is wait_event_interruptible() treated differently compared to wait_for_completion_interruptible()? > Kirill Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists