lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 14 Apr 2019 22:49:49 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] RISC-V: Add separate asm/encoding.h for spec
 related defines

On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 03:38:35PM +0000, Anup Patel wrote:
> It's better to have all RISC-V spec related defines in one place
> so this patch adds separate asm/encoding.h for such defines which
> can be included in assembly as well as C code.

As per the discussion of version 1 on Saturday I disagree with this
move.  There is both a philosophical and a practical reason for that:

 a) in RISC-V CSR access is really nicely split out into a separate
    number space, just accessed through a few special instructions.
    It has no overlap with the rest of instruction encoding
 b) <asm/csr.h> is pulled into just about every file build in the kernel
    though <asm/irqflags.h>, <asm/switch_to.h> and <asm/thread_info.h>

So even if you want to later add a new <asm/encoding.h> for instruction
encoding details later, I'd rather prefer to keep CSR access separate
from it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists