lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:36:13 +0300
From:   Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1] perf record: collect user registers set jointly with dwarf
 stacks


When dwarf stacks are collected jointly with user specified register
set using --user-regs option like below the full register context is
still captured on a sample:

  $ perf record -g --call-graph dwarf,1024 --user-regs=IP,SP,BP -- matrix.gcc.g.O3

  188143843893585 0x6b48 [0x4f8]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x4002): 23828/23828: 0x401236 period: 1363819 addr: 0x7ffedbdd51ac
  ... FP chain: nr:0
  ... user regs: mask 0xff0fff ABI 64-bit
  .... AX    0x53b
  .... BX    0x7ffedbdd3cc0
  .... CX    0xffffffff
  .... DX    0x33d3a
  .... SI    0x7f09b74c38d0
  .... DI    0x0
  .... BP    0x401260
  .... SP    0x7ffedbdd3cc0
  .... IP    0x401236
  .... FLAGS 0x20a
  .... CS    0x33
  .... SS    0x2b
  .... R8    0x7f09b74c3800
  .... R9    0x7f09b74c2da0
  .... R10   0xfffffffffffff3ce
  .... R11   0x246
  .... R12   0x401070
  .... R13   0x7ffedbdd5db0
  .... R14   0x0
  .... R15   0x0
  ... ustack: size 1024, offset 0xe0
   . data_src: 0x5080021
   ... thread: stack_test2.g.O:23828
   ...... dso: /root/abudanko/stacks/stack_test2.g.O3

After applying the change suggested in the patch the sample data contain
only user specified register values:

  $ perf record -g --call-graph dwarf,1024 --user-regs=IP,SP,BP -- matrix.gcc.g.03

  188368474305373 0x5e40 [0x470]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x4002): 23839/23839: 0x401236 period: 1260507 addr: 0x7ffd3d85e96c
  ... FP chain: nr:0
  ... user regs: mask 0x1c0 ABI 64-bit
  .... BP    0x401260
  .... SP    0x7ffd3d85cc20
  .... IP    0x401236
  ... ustack: size 1024, offset 0x58
   . data_src: 0x5080021
   ... thread: stack_test2.g.O:23839
   ...... dso: /root/abudanko/stacks/stack_test2.g.O3

Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 84cfb9fe2fc6..29a223b4c699 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -702,7 +702,8 @@ static void __perf_evsel__config_callchain(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
 		if (!function) {
 			perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, REGS_USER);
 			perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, STACK_USER);
-			attr->sample_regs_user |= PERF_REGS_MASK;
+			if (!opts->sample_user_regs)
+				attr->sample_regs_user |= PERF_REGS_MASK;
 			attr->sample_stack_user = param->dump_size;
 			attr->exclude_callchain_user = 1;
 		} else {
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ