[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77b364e5-a30c-964a-6985-00b759dac128@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:43:18 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes
On 4/15/19 4:42 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> Friendly ping. I haven't heard any complains so can we route this via
>> tip/x86/mm or should we go via mmotm.
> It seems that Dave is busy. Let's add Andrew. Can we get this [1] merged
> finally, please?
Sorry these slipped through the cracks.
These look sane to me. Because it pokes around mm/page_alloc.c a bit,
and could impact other architectures, my preference would be for Andrew
to pick these up for -mm. But, I don't feel that strongly about it.
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists