linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:43:18 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes

On 4/15/19 4:42 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> Friendly ping. I haven't heard any complains so can we route this via
>> tip/x86/mm or should we go via mmotm.
> It seems that Dave is busy. Let's add Andrew. Can we get this [1] merged
> finally, please?

Sorry these slipped through the cracks.

These look sane to me.  Because it pokes around mm/page_alloc.c a bit,
and could impact other architectures, my preference would be for Andrew
to pick these up for -mm.  But, I don't feel that strongly about it.

Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>