lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190415162148.GM4038@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:21:48 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org> Subject: Re: [patch V4 01/32] mm/slab: Fix broken stack trace storage On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 06:07:44PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > + struct stack_trace trace = { > > > + /* Leave one for the end marker below */ > > > + .max_entries = size - 1, > > > + .entries = addr, > > > + .skip = 3, > > > + }; > > Looks like stack_trace.nr_entries isn't initialized? (though this code > > gets eventually replaced by a later patch) > > struct initializer initialized the non mentioned fields to 0, if I'm not > totally mistaken. Correct.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists