[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612BA4C4F65E@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 06:31:03 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
"Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)" <jan.steffens@...il.com>
CC: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ZEN: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>
> Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
>
> Fixes: 26e2aa63d568 ("ZEN: Add VHBA driver")
> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
>
> There was also a report about:
>
> drivers/scsi/vhba/vhba.c:184:8-27: atomic_dec_and_test variation before
> object free at line 185.
>
> that Elena may want to comment on.
>
>
Yes, on a quick look it seems that you should be using refcount_t type and not
atomic_t for your reference counter, as you use it as classical refcounter, i.e.
free the object upon reaching zero, etc:
static void vhba_device_put (struct vhba_device *vdev)
{
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&vdev->refcnt)) {
kfree(vdev);
}
}
Any reason why you didn't use refcount_t type to begin with?
Best Regards,
Elena.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists