[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190416175340.21068-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:52:39 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/62] securityfs: fix use-after-free on symlink traversal
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
symlink body shouldn't be freed without an RCU delay. Switch securityfs
to ->destroy_inode() and use of call_rcu(); free both the inode and symlink
body in the callback.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
security/inode.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/inode.c b/security/inode.c
index b7772a9b315e..421dd72b5876 100644
--- a/security/inode.c
+++ b/security/inode.c
@@ -27,17 +27,22 @@
static struct vfsmount *mount;
static int mount_count;
-static void securityfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
+static void securityfs_i_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
{
- truncate_inode_pages_final(&inode->i_data);
- clear_inode(inode);
+ struct inode *inode = container_of(head, struct inode, i_rcu);
if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
kfree(inode->i_link);
+ free_inode_nonrcu(inode);
+}
+
+static void securityfs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, securityfs_i_callback);
}
static const struct super_operations securityfs_super_operations = {
.statfs = simple_statfs,
- .evict_inode = securityfs_evict_inode,
+ .destroy_inode = securityfs_destroy_inode,
};
static int fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists