linux-kernel - Re: RFC: on adding new CLONE_* flags [WAS Re: [PATCH 0/4] clone: add CLONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:37:33 +0200
From:   "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To:     Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Cc:     Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        jannh@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, serge@...lyn.com, luto@...nel.org,
        arnd@...db.de, ebiederm@...ssion.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        dancol@...gle.com
Subject: Re: RFC: on adding new CLONE_* flags [WAS Re: [PATCH 0/4] clone: add
 CLONE_PIDFD]

On 15.04.19 21:59, Aleksa Sarai wrote:

> Just spit-balling -- is no_new_privs not sufficient for this usecase?> Not granting privileges such as setuid during execve(2) is the main>
point of that flag.
Oh, I wasn't aware of that. Thanks.


--mtx

-- 
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287