| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:04:00 -0700
From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@...-tech.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Otto Sabart <ottosabart@...erm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 4/5] arm: Use common cpu_topology
On 4/16/19 6:09 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 02:16:43PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
>> On 4/15/19 8:31 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 04:48:05PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
>>>> Currently, ARM32 and ARM64 uses different data structures to
>>>> represent their cpu toplogies. Since, we are moving the ARM64
>>>> topology to common code to be used by other architectures, we
>>>> can reuse that for ARM32 as well.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h | 22 +---------------------
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>> include/linux/arch_topology.h | 10 +++++++++-
>>>> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
>>>> index d4e76e0a..7c850611 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
>>>> @@ -36,17 +36,25 @@ unsigned long topology_get_freq_scale(int cpu)
>>>> struct cpu_topology {
>>>> int thread_id;
>>>> int core_id;
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY
>>>> + int socket_id;
>>>
>>> Sorry, but I can't find any reason why we need to do this ifdef dance
>>> here, especially for socket_id vs package_id ?
>>
>> I was not sure if we can rename socket_id to package_id from a semantic
>> point of view. If you are okay with it, I will change it to package_id and
>> send a v4.
>>
>
> Thanks, all make sure to cc linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
> just noticed that's missing and you are asking for testing on ARM
> platforms :)
>
My bad!! I didn't realize that linux-arm-kernel is not included. Thanks
for pointing that out.
>> Other's I can understand
>>> as there are new, but I am sure we can find a way and get away with
>>> #ifdefery here completely.
>>>
>> That would be good. Any suggestions on how to do that?
>>
>
> Do you see any issues having extra structure members for ARM ?
> Something like below seem to compile + boot fine on my 32-bit TC2 with
> proper topology info on top of your series. Of course, more testing is
> better, but I don't see any issue keeping llc_{id,sibling} around for
> ARM eliminating the need for #ifdefs
>
I thought adding unused members for ARM32 might be unacceptable :).
I will update my v4 with this.
Regards,
Atish
> Let me know if I am missing something.
>
> -->8
>
> diff --git i/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c w/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> index 0ddb24c76c17..f2aa942e0cfa 100644
> --- i/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> +++ w/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
>
> - if (cpuid_topo->socket_id != cpu_topo->socket_id)
> + if (cpuid_topo->package_id != cpu_topo->package_id)
> continue;
>
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> @@ -250,12 +250,12 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> /* core performance interdependency */
> cpuid_topo->thread_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> cpuid_topo->core_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> - cpuid_topo->socket_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2);
> + cpuid_topo->package_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2);
> } else {
> /* largely independent cores */
> cpuid_topo->thread_id = -1;
> cpuid_topo->core_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> - cpuid_topo->socket_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> + cpuid_topo->package_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> }
> } else {
> /*
> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> */
> cpuid_topo->thread_id = -1;
> cpuid_topo->core_id = 0;
> - cpuid_topo->socket_id = -1;
> + cpuid_topo->package_id = -1;
> }
>
> update_siblings_masks(cpuid);
> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> pr_info("CPU%u: thread %d, cpu %d, socket %d, mpidr %x\n",
> cpuid, cpu_topology[cpuid].thread_id,
> cpu_topology[cpuid].core_id,
> - cpu_topology[cpuid].socket_id, mpidr);
> + cpu_topology[cpuid].package_id, mpidr);
> }
>
> static inline int cpu_corepower_flags(void)
> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
>
> cpu_topo->thread_id = -1;
> cpu_topo->core_id = -1;
> - cpu_topo->socket_id = -1;
> + cpu_topo->package_id = -1;
> cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->thread_sibling);
> }
> diff --git i/include/linux/arch_topology.h w/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> index 7c850611986d..8e82389c2bed 100644
> --- i/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> +++ w/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> @@ -36,13 +36,9 @@ unsigned long topology_get_freq_scale(int cpu)
> struct cpu_topology {
> int thread_id;
> int core_id;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY
> - int socket_id;
> -#else
> int package_id;
> int llc_id;
> cpumask_t llc_sibling;
> -#endif
> cpumask_t thread_sibling;
> cpumask_t core_sibling;
> };
> @@ -50,11 +46,7 @@ struct cpu_topology {
> #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY
> extern struct cpu_topology cpu_topology[NR_CPUS];
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY
> -#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].socket_id)
> -#else
> #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].package_id)
> -#endif
> #define topology_core_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].core_id)
> #define topology_core_cpumask(cpu) (&cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling)
> #define topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu) (&cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists