[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190416193109.GA7976@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:31:09 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] perf tools: Check maps for bpf programs
Em Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 06:01:22PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
>
> As reported by Jiri Olsa in:
>
> "[BUG] perf: intel_pt won't display kernel function"
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190403143738.GB32001@krava
>
> Recent changes to support PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL and PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT
> broke --kallsyms option. This is because it broke test __map__is_kmodule.
>
> This patch fixes this by adding check for bpf program, so that these maps
> are not mistaken as kernel modules.
Thanks, applied to perf/urgent.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists