[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190416141949.09b48789@lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:19:49 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Convert hwmon documentation to ReST
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:09:16 -0700
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> The big real-world question is: Is the series good enough for you to accept,
> or do you expect some level of user/kernel separation ?
I guess it can go in; it's forward progress, even if it doesn't make the
improvements I would like to see.
The real question, I guess, is who should take it. I've been seeing a
fair amount of activity on hwmon, so I suspect that the potential for
conflicts is real. Perhaps things would go smoother if it went through
your tree?
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists