lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:19:49 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>, Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Convert hwmon documentation to ReST On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:09:16 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote: > The big real-world question is: Is the series good enough for you to accept, > or do you expect some level of user/kernel separation ? I guess it can go in; it's forward progress, even if it doesn't make the improvements I would like to see. The real question, I guess, is who should take it. I've been seeing a fair amount of activity on hwmon, so I suspect that the potential for conflicts is real. Perhaps things would go smoother if it went through your tree? Thanks, jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists