lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190416202744.GA12533@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:27:44 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/76] 4.9.169-stable review

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 01:19:13PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 08:46:00PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 09:29:35AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 08:43:24PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.169 release.
> > > > There are 76 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Wed Apr 17 18:36:37 UTC 2019.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Build results:
> > > 	total: 172 pass: 165 fail: 7
> > > Failed builds: 
> > > 	<all parisc>
> > > Qemu test results:
> > > 	total: 320 pass: 304 fail: 16
> > > Failed tests: 
> > > 	<all parisc>
> > > 
> > > Build failures as already reported.
> > 
> > I should have those build failures fixed.
> > 
> 
> I didn't rebuild the other images, but parisc build and boot tests
> are now fine (with v4.9.168-78-g6ecae2ce7b5a).

Wonderful, thanks for testing this, and all of the others.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ