[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190416160143.8292ced993dc803aae7fa0da@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:01:43 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
hpa@...or.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, adobriyan@...il.com,
aubrey.li@...el.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 1/3] /proc/pid/status: Add support for architecture
specific output
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:32:48 +0800 Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> The architecture specific information of the running processes could
> be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
> specific information externally.
The implementation looks just fine to me. Have you had any feedback on
the overall desirability of adding this feature?
> --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,11 @@
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> +/* Add support for architecture specific output in /proc/pid/status */
> +#ifndef arch_proc_pid_status
> +#define arch_proc_pid_status(m, task)
> +#endif
To this I suggest adding
/* arch_proc_pid_status() must be defined in asm/processor.h */
Because we've regularly had different architectures defining such things
in different headers, resulting in a mess.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists