[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190416163034.3e642818ebf27ed6891c1981@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:30:34 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdb: Get rid of broken attempt to print CCVERSION in
kdb summary
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:06:23 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:55 AM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > If you drop into kdb and type "summary", it prints out a line that
> > says this:
> >
> > ccversion CCVERSION
> >
> > ...and I don't mean that it actually prints out the version of the C
> > compiler. It literally prints out the string "CCVERSION".
> >
> > The version of the C Compiler is already printed at boot up and it
> > doesn't seem useful to replicate this in kdb. Let's just delete it.
> > We can also delete the bit of the Makefile that called the C compiler
> > in an attempt to pass this into kdb. This will remove one extra call
> > to the C compiler at Makefile parse time and (very slightly) speed up
> > builds.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
>
> I know you add lots of Cc: lines
> when you pick up patches, but I think
> your script can be improved.
>
> You added "Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>",
> but Douglas is the author.
> I think the author should be excluded from Cc.
Whoops.
It's pretty benign: Doug will still only get a single email.
checkpatch checks for duplicates cc's but I think it assumes that
things like
Reported-by: fred
Tested-by: fred
were intentional.
It would perhaps be better for checkpatch to special-case the "Cc:
fred" tag and report a duplicated Cc: if fred was also mentioned in any
other tag.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists