[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-8b39adbee805c539a461dbf208b125b096152b1c@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:01:14 -0700
From: tip-bot for Bart Van Assche <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, will.deacon@....com,
bvanassche@....org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shhuiw@...mail.com, mingo@...nel.org, longman@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:locking/urgent] locking/lockdep: Make lockdep_unregister_key()
honor 'debug_locks' again
Commit-ID: 8b39adbee805c539a461dbf208b125b096152b1c
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/8b39adbee805c539a461dbf208b125b096152b1c
Author: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:05:38 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:21:51 +0200
locking/lockdep: Make lockdep_unregister_key() honor 'debug_locks' again
If lockdep_register_key() and lockdep_unregister_key() are called with
debug_locks == false then the following warning is reported:
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 15145 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4920 lockdep_unregister_key+0x1ad/0x240
That warning is reported because lockdep_unregister_key() ignores the
value of 'debug_locks' and because the behavior of lockdep_register_key()
depends on whether or not 'debug_locks' is set. Fix this inconsistency
by making lockdep_unregister_key() take 'debug_locks' again into
account.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: shenghui <shhuiw@...mail.com>
Fixes: 90c1cba2b3b3 ("locking/lockdep: Zap lock classes even with lock debugging disabled")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190415170538.23491-1-bvanassche@acm.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index e16766ff184b..e221be724fe8 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4907,8 +4907,9 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
return;
raw_local_irq_save(flags);
- arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
- current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+ if (!graph_lock())
+ goto out_irq;
+
pf = get_pending_free();
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(k, hash_head, hash_entry) {
if (k == key) {
@@ -4920,8 +4921,8 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
WARN_ON_ONCE(!found);
__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, key, 1);
call_rcu_zapped(pf);
- current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
- arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
+ graph_unlock();
+out_irq:
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
/* Wait until is_dynamic_key() has finished accessing k->hash_entry. */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists