linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: SVM: Add support for KVM_SEV_GM_GET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190416081545.GA27892@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:15:45 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Hao Feng <fenghao@...on.cn>
Cc:     'Joerg Roedel ' <joro@...tes.org>,
        'Paolo Bonzini ' <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        ' Radim Krčmář ' <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        'Thomas Gleixner ' <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        'Ingo Molnar ' <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "' H. Peter Anvin '" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Zhaohui Du <duzhaohui@...on.cn>,
        Zhiwei Ying <yingzhiwei@...on.cn>, Wen Pu <puwen@...on.cn>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: SVM: Add support for KVM_SEV_GM_GET_DIGEST
 command

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 07:54:40AM +0000, Hao Feng wrote:
> Thanks for the comments, I thought there could be multiple signers...

There can be multiple signers but as you've read in the sections above,
those SOBs all have a meaning and in your case it wasn't clear what that
meaning is.

> After reading through the guidelines again, seems I should use the
> following statements instead?
> 
> Co-developed-by: Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn><mailto:puwen@...on.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn><mailto:puwen@...on.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Feng <fenghao@...on.cn><mailto:fenghao@...on.cn>

Yes, as long as you realize that having the From: you makes you the
author of the patch and Pu Wen is fine with that.

Btw, you should fix your mailer to send plain text only and not add
those <mailto: > crap tags above.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.