| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <703cdbf0-b425-880b-b087-aaf3fe84673d@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:55:34 +0800
From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<will.deacon@....com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, <horms@...ge.net.au>,
<takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] memblock: add memblock_cap_memory_ranges for
multiple ranges
Hi Mike,
On 2019/4/16 3:09, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 06:57:23PM +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
>> The memblock_cap_memory_range() removes all the memory except the
>> range passed to it. Extend this function to receive memblock_type
>> with the regions that should be kept.
>>
>> Enable this function in arm64 for reservation of multiple regions
>> for the crash kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> I didn't work on this version, please drop the signed-off.
Sorry about this. I should ask you firstly before doing it this way. I will drop it.
remove_size);
>> + }
>> +
>> + memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved,
>> + regs[nr - 1].base + regs[nr - 1].size, PHYS_ADDR_MAX);
>> +}
>> +
>
> I've double-checked and I see no problem with using
> for_each_mem_range_rev() iterators for removing some ranges. And with them
> this functions becomes much clearer and more efficient.
>
> Can you please check if the below patch works for you?
>
>>>From e25e6c9cd94a01abac124deacc66e5d258fdbf7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:02:32 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] memblock: extend memblock_cap_memory_range to multiple ranges
>
> The memblock_cap_memory_range() removes all the memory except the range
> passed to it. Extend this function to receive an array of memblock_regions
> that should be kept. This allows switching to simple iteration over
> memblock arrays with 'for_each_mem_range_rev' to remove the unneeded memory.
>
> Enable use of this function in arm64 for reservation of multiple regions for
> the crash kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> include/linux/memblock.h | 2 +-
> mm/memblock.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 6bc1350..8665d29 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(memstart_addr);
> phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> +
> +/* at most two crash kernel regions, low_region and high_region */
> +#define CRASH_MAX_USABLE_RANGES 2
> +
> /*
> * reserve_crashkernel() - reserves memory for crash kernel
> *
> @@ -280,9 +284,9 @@ early_param("mem", early_mem);
> static int __init early_init_dt_scan_usablemem(unsigned long node,
> const char *uname, int depth, void *data)
> {
> - struct memblock_region *usablemem = data;
> - const __be32 *reg;
> - int len;
> + struct memblock_type *usablemem = data;
> + const __be32 *reg, *endp;
> + int len, nr = 0;
>
> if (depth != 1 || strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0)
> return 0;
> @@ -291,22 +295,32 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_usablemem(unsigned long node,
> if (!reg || (len < (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells)))
> return 1;
>
> - usablemem->base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, ®);
> - usablemem->size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, ®);
> + endp = reg + (len / sizeof(__be32));
> + while ((endp - reg) >= (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells)) {
> + unsigned long base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, ®);
> + unsigned long size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, ®);
>
> + if (memblock_add_range(usablemem, base, size, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> + MEMBLOCK_NONE))
> + return 0;
> + if (++nr >= CRASH_MAX_USABLE_RANGES)
> + break;
> + }
> return 1;
> }
>
> static void __init fdt_enforce_memory_region(void)
> {
> - struct memblock_region reg = {
> - .size = 0,
> + struct memblock_region usable_regions[CRASH_MAX_USABLE_RANGES];
> + struct memblock_type usablemem = {
> + .max = CRASH_MAX_USABLE_RANGES,
> + .regions = usable_regions,
> };
>
> - of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_usablemem, ®);
> + of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_usablemem, &usablemem);
>
> - if (reg.size)
> - memblock_cap_memory_range(reg.base, reg.size);
> + if (usablemem.cnt)
> + memblock_cap_memory_ranges(usablemem.regions, usablemem.cnt);
> }
>
> void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 294d5d8..f5c029b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ phys_addr_t memblock_mem_size(unsigned long limit_pfn);
> phys_addr_t memblock_start_of_DRAM(void);
> phys_addr_t memblock_end_of_DRAM(void);
> void memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t memory_limit);
> -void memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> +void memblock_cap_memory_ranges(struct memblock_region *regions, int count);
> void memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit);
> bool memblock_is_memory(phys_addr_t addr);
> bool memblock_is_map_memory(phys_addr_t addr);
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index e7665cf..8d4d060 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1605,36 +1605,31 @@ void __init memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t limit)
> PHYS_ADDR_MAX);
> }
>
> -void __init memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> -{
> - int start_rgn, end_rgn;
> - int i, ret;
> -
> - if (!size)
> - return;
> -
> - ret = memblock_isolate_range(&memblock.memory, base, size,
> - &start_rgn, &end_rgn);
> - if (ret)
> - return;
> -
> - /* remove all the MAP regions */
> - for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= end_rgn; i--)
> - if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i]))
> - memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i);
> +void __init memblock_cap_memory_ranges(struct memblock_region *regions,
> + int count)
> +{
> + struct memblock_type regions_to_keep = {
> + .max = count,
> + .cnt = count,
> + .regions = regions,
> + };
> + phys_addr_t start, end;
> + u64 i;
>
> - for (i = start_rgn - 1; i >= 0; i--)
> - if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i]))
> - memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i);
> + /* truncate memory while skipping NOMAP regions */
> + for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.memory, ®ions_to_keep,
> + NUMA_NO_NODE, MEMBLOCK_NONE, &start, &end, NULL)
> + memblock_remove(start, end);
Yes, this works well.
A minor issue, replace memblock_remove(start, end) with memblock_remove(start, end - start).
>
> /* truncate the reserved regions */
> - memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, 0, base);
> - memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved,
> - base + size, PHYS_ADDR_MAX);
> + for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.reserved, ®ions_to_keep,
> + NUMA_NO_NODE, MEMBLOCK_NONE, &start, &end, NULL)
> + memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, start, end);
The same as above. Replace memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, start, end) with
memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, start, end - start).
Thanks,
Chen Zhou
> }
>
> void __init memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit)
> {
> + struct memblock_region region = { 0 };
> phys_addr_t max_addr;
>
> if (!limit)
> @@ -1646,7 +1641,8 @@ void __init memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit)
> if (max_addr == PHYS_ADDR_MAX)
> return;
>
> - memblock_cap_memory_range(0, max_addr);
> + region.size = max_addr;
> + memblock_cap_memory_ranges(®ion, 1);
> }
>
> static int __init_memblock memblock_search(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr_t addr)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists