[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4747d10b-e9a4-f453-ab4e-13fc984a4067@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:18:50 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-tip 0/2] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 2
follow-up patches
On 04/16/2019 09:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 04:58:27PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> This series contain 2 follow-up patches to alleviate the performance
>> regression found in the page_fault1 test of the will-it-scale benchmark.
>> This does not recover all the lost performance, but reclaim a sizeable
>> portion of it.
>>
>> The regression was found on an Intel system. I have run the test on
>> an AMD system. The regression wasn't seen there. There are only minor
>> variations in performance. Perhaps the page fault path is quite different
>> between Intel and AMD systems.
> Can you please just fold this back into the appropriate patches? Trying
> to review all the back and forth is painful.
I will send out an update part 2 patch with patch 1 of this series
merged into the writer spinning on reader patch. Patch 2 of this series
will be a standalone one.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists