linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH wireless-drivers] rtlwifi: rtl8723ae: Fix missing break in switch statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ece38547-f29e-b3a5-879e-11feb15b2c4e@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:03:34 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-drivers] rtlwifi: rtl8723ae: Fix missing break in
 switch statement



On 4/16/19 10:58 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:

>>> You have marked this for wireless-drivers but the commit is 2.5 years
>>> old, so I think wireless-drivers-next is more approriate.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah. This can actually be applied to both of them.  What I'd like is
>> to have this applied to stable, so I thought wireless-drivers was a
>> more straightforward way.
> 
> Sure, makes sense. But I just want to keep the number of patches going
> to wireless-drivers to the minimum, I really want to avoid conflicts as
> much as possible. That's why I'm keeping the bar high for w-d.
> 

Yep. I've got it.

I just sent v2:

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1062748/

Thanks
--
Gustavo